.

Thursday, February 7, 2019

The Effects of Technology on the Right of Freedom of Speech

The effects of Technology on the Right of Freedom of SpeechFreedom of quarrel is a cornerstone of democratic political and social institutions. It is responsible for the empty flow of ideas and information to anyone who wishes to listen. Freedom of speech supports free sentiment and sharing of thoughts, precisely along with these good characteristics there argon also harmful ones. With the unequi blunt aspects such as art, journalism, and the pursuit of truth come negatives aspects such as pornography, gambling, and hate and shock orders. To continue with free speech people, must relieve these negative aspects such as The Blackplague shock site, The Blackplague, http//www.blackplague.org/. The contents of this site are repulsive, disturbing, and offensive to the majority of the population. There are countless pictures, texts, and videos of sex, death, and the most roughshod gentleman behavior imaginable. No matter what is included in the site though, it is still a reflection of society and paints a picture of world because of the people who maintain and contribute to the site. The creators of this site use digital methods to blossom forth their message and raise some questions about free speech and the profit as a whole. Should the Internet be regulated and more government control take place or should the Internet not be regulated and allow disturbing material such as The Blackplague to be accessible to everyone including little children? These are major social questions that are being raised with major implications for the future attached to the answers. Technology has changed the issue of liberty of speech because it has changed the amount of access and overall information people hold in available to them today. Technology, such as the Internet, ha... ...iterate cultures root metaphor, for the human mind(pg. 11). Print-thinkings boundaries cannot control digital thinking as grade technologies regulations cannot control digital information. Ha te and shock sites must be left(a) uncensored because they defend a regulation. They are one of the ugliest parts of that principle but they are still a very important and vocal part of it. Total freedom of speech is inevitable, as digital thinking will not tolerate boundaries because they are contradictory to its very temper of constant dynamic change. Works CitedBolter, Jay David. Writing Space. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. 1991Gilster, Paul. Digital Literacy. Wiley Computer makeLandow, George P. Hypertext 2.0Lanham, Richard A. The Electronic Word. University of Chicago Press. 1989The Blackplague. 12-2-98. http//www.blackplague.org/

No comments:

Post a Comment